Paul Keeling: The Vancouver School District isn’t listening to parents’ concerns. Instead, the “plan” is to give the technology to teachers and students and let them figure it out, like guinea pigs
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
School’s out for summer. If the Vancouver School District has its way, school will be very different this fall.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
In May, the district announced its plan to bring Microsoft Copilot (a generative AI chatbot) into classrooms, a fundamental change in education, with virtually no public input or discussion.
This development is not surprising, given the current AI hype and the staggering amount of money behind it. The surprise is how school administrators are rushing to get AI into the hands (and minds) of teachers and students, citing no evidence of its educational value, while ignoring evidence to the contrary.
Even if AI chatbots were a reliable source of information (which they are not), there is growing evidence that AI harms learning. AI use is correlated with worse learning outcomes, poorer critical thinking, reduced ability to accurately judge one’s own performance, and reduced ability to discern misinformation over time. AI chatbots agree with users, even when users are factually incorrect. Research also indicates that when the AI crutch is taken away, students that have used AI tend to perform worse than those who have never used it, and using AI as a sole study aid is worse for comprehension and retention than just taking conventional notes. The majority of students use AI to solve problems for them, rather than to learn. When adult professionals rely on AI tools, they lose skills.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Ironically, despite clichés about teaching “critical thinking,” school administrators are not critically evaluating an untested and unproven technology before launching it. When the negative effects of smartphones were understood, their use in classrooms was restricted. The burden of proof clearly lies with those pushing for the new technology.
Instead, the “plan” is to give the technology to teachers and students and let them figure it out, like guinea pigs. The industry jargon for this is “beta testing.”
In a CBC interview on June 3, Vancouver School Board associate superintendent Pedro da Silva and Surrey school district superintendent Mark Pearmain were both adamant that Microsoft Copilot must be deployed in schools, but did not explain why or how it will be used. Both echoed familiar AI industry marketing instead.
“For us, it’s now an opportunity for the teachers and the students to work through how to leverage the tool to support the learning environment,” De Silva said. Pearmain said he is “excited to see the opportunities that AI brings that can enhance a student’s experience in school,” with no explanation how that might occur.
The main justification for AI chatbots in schools (echoed by Pearmain) is: “We can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”
This argument is spurious. Obviously, any technology, once invented, cannot be uninvented. It does not follow, however, that the “genie” must go everywhere and be welcomed into every aspect of human life and functioning. It certainly need not be rushed into K-12 education with no real understanding of its educational, psychological and social impacts.
The fact that kids already have access to generative AI does not recommend its use for school assignments any more than kids having social media means that social media is a good educational tool. Ways to cheat in school — such as essay writing services — have existed for decades, but were never accepted as “thought partners.”
We are told that “AI is the future,” so kids must learn how to use it. But AI “literacy” is not clearly defined. Learning how to use a chatbot takes about five minutes. Teaching kids how AI works does not require experimentally releasing AI into all classes in order to see what might happen. Students presumably must “fact-check” every chatbot answer, but doing this requires patient, traditional thinking skills and sourcing methods, which are precisely what use of AI is likely to erode. And today’s tech products are likely to soon be obsolete anyway.
What we need is good evidence that AI is good for student learning, not ad hoc rationalizations for its blind adoption.
How will AI help students know what is true and relevant, retain what they learn, feel proud of what they make, and foster their emotional and intellectual growth, resilience, and human skill development? The schools have not answered these questions. In fact, they seem unwilling to ask them.
There is no good argument for rushing this. Even Anthropic, an AI company, admits, “We are only at the beginning of understanding AI’s impact on education.” An organization calling itself Parents for AI Caution in Educational Spaces (PACES) now has a petition to demand a pause on AI in our schools before September, to allow for more research and dialogue.
This is not about being “for” or “against” AI. It is about the foundational skills our kids need and what is good for their education.
Paul Keeling is a Vancouver-based writer who has authored articles for Sierra, Orion, Earth Island Journal, Philosophy Now, Globe and Mail, Vancouver Sun, The Tyee, and the academic journals Environmental Values, Environmental Ethics, and International Journal of Wilderness. He is the father of a Vancouver high school student and has joined PACES.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2026 Vancouver Sun, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
You can manage saved articles in your account.
and save up to 100 articles!
You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.
Leave a Reply