Entertainment giants Disney and Universal have jointly filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Midjourney, alleging that the image-generation platform unlawfully reproduces copyrighted characters owned by the studios.
Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.
yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.
By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
The complaint, filed in federal court in California, accuses Midjourney of enabling users to generate images that closely resemble well-known characters from major film and television franchises, including Disney’s Marvel and Star Wars properties as well as Universal’s animated characters. The studios claim the AI company’s system was trained using copyrighted material without authorization and continues to facilitate the creation of infringing content.
According to Toy People, the lawsuit marks one of the most significant legal actions brought by major Hollywood studios against a generative AI company. The plaintiffs argue that Midjourney’s image-generation technology can produce recognizable depictions of protected characters, potentially undermining the value of intellectual property rights held by content creators.
Read more: DOJ Pushes Patent Disputes Out of Antitrust Arena in Disney, Samsung Cases
Beyond the copyright allegations, the case is also drawing attention from legal observers because of its potential implications for competition and antitrust issues within the rapidly growing AI sector. Large media companies have increasingly voiced concerns that AI developers may be building commercial products using copyrighted content without licensing agreements, allowing technology firms to compete in creative markets while avoiding costs traditionally associated with content production.
The lawsuit seeks damages as well as court orders that would prevent Midjourney from continuing to generate allegedly infringing images. Disney and Universal contend that the platform has failed to implement adequate safeguards despite being aware of repeated claims that users could create images resembling protected characters.
Midjourney has not been found liable for any wrongdoing, and the allegations remain subject to judicial review. The case is expected to become a closely watched legal battle as courts continue to address how existing copyright laws apply to generative artificial intelligence technologies.
Source: Toy People
UK Appeals Court Overturns Tribunal Decision in Long-Running Pfizer-Flynn Antitrust Case
Jun 21, 2026 by CPI
Rhode Island Approves New Rules on Lawyer Use of AI
Jun 21, 2026 by CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Claims Against YachtWorld Owner in Online Boat Listings Dispute
Jun 21, 2026 by CPI
Southern Glazer’s, FTC Seek Pause in Price Discrimination Case as Settlement Talks Advance
Jun 21, 2026 by CPI
Telecom Argentina Wins Conditional Approval for Telefónica Acquisition Following Antitrust Review
Jun 21, 2026 by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani
Leave a Reply