You are logged in
Loading…
You don’t have any Active Subscription.
Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.
Your active subscription(s)
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
Products you’ve access to
Additional Subscription Benefits
Account Settings
Need help with your subscription?
July 2, 2026e-Paper
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary.
The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
July 2, 2026e-Paper
Published – July 02, 2026 04:20 am IST
Music composer Ilaiyaraaja. File | Photo Credit: ANI
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 1, 2026) ruled in favour of music label Saregama India Ltd. in its copyright dispute with composer Ilaiyaraaja, restraining him from broadcasting or communicating the songs in question from 134 films dating back to 1976, till further orders.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that while Mr. Ilaiyaraaja continues to enjoy copyright over the musical compositions he created, those rights do not extend to the sound recordings incorporated in films, the copyright in which vests with the producer, Saregama.
“The right of the defendant/Ilaiyaraaja to the extent conferred by Section 14(a) of the (Copyright) Act of the right to adaptation is limited to the extent of “musical work”, that is, the musical composition of the songs claimed to have been infringed, sans the lyrics,” the court said.
Saregama had told the court that between 1976 and 2001 it entered into assignment agreements with producers of several cinematograph films. By virtue of these agreements, it claimed ownership of the copyrights in the sound recordings as well as the underlying musical and literary works of songs forming part of those films.
The company alleged that it recently came across the infringing use of the copyrighted works by Mr. Ilaiyaraaja by uploading the same on various platforms like Amazon music, iTunes, Jio Saavan etc. It also alleged Mr. Ilaiyaraaja of having made ownership claims over the infringing content.
The court held that Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s rights under the Copyright Act were confined to the musical compositions and that any exploitation of the disputed sound recordings would, prima facie, amount to copyright infringement.
“Since there is no denial to the broadcasting of songs which are subject matter of the suit referred cinematograph films, the defendant/Ilaiyaraaja, prima facie, appears to be indulging in acts which would tantamount to infringement,” the court added.
The order covers an extensive list of 134 films, including well-known titles such as Annakkili (1976), 16 Vayathiniley (1977), Mullum Malarum (1978), Netrikkann (1981), and Raaja Paarvai (1981).
Published – July 02, 2026 04:20 am IST
Delhi
Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
BACK TO TOP
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
Leave a Reply