Practical insights from and for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
The near-ubiquitous use of artificial intelligence in universities is generating new sources of stress, as students worry over the potential ramifications of both using and not using the technology.
A survey of more than 1,200 Australian students has uncovered a hierarchy of concerns about AI, including negative cognitive impacts, breaches of privacy, unfair competition for grades and groundless accusations of cheating.
The survey by data analytics company YouGov also revealed ambiguous attitudes about AI’s impacts on careers, with many respondents considering it both a threat to job security and a prerequisite for employability.
Such misgivings have not stymied uptake of the technology, with 84 per cent of Australian students now using AI tools at least occasionally, up from 74 per cent when similar research was conducted a year earlier.
The findings come from the Australian segment of a global study commissioned by student support company Studiosity. Like their UK counterparts, Australian respondents were particularly worried about being wrongly flagged for misconduct. Fifty-two per cent nominated “being accused of cheating when I did nothing wrong” among their top three fears about the technology.
“The biggest cause of AI-related stress for students isn’t necessarily about the technology itself, but the institutional response to it,” the report says.
Such concerns may be well placed. Social media platforms are replete with posts about students’ genuine work being flagged as “likely AI-generated”. The ABC last year reported that thousands of Australian Catholic University (ACU) students who had “done nothing wrong” incurred sanctions for AI-related academic misconduct. A subsequent report found that it was a “sector-wide problem”.
ACU said academic misconduct referrals had increased since the emergence of generative AI. “We know that many students are concerned about how the use of AI in assessments is identified and reviewed,” a spokeswoman said. “A flagged submission triggers further review, not an automatic finding of misconduct…but where there are concerns about the authenticity of a student’s work, universities have an obligation to [investigate].”
Such concerns transcend the academy. Works identified as AI-generated, according to reports, include the Harry Potter novels, Queen’s Bohemian Rhapsody, Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, the US Constitution and the Bible.
The survey found that female and international students were particularly worried about being wrongly flagged as AI cheats. Students with disabilities or special educational needs were almost four times as likely as other students to experience “a lot of stress” when using AI tools.
Most respondents said they used AI primarily as a learning adjunct rather than a time-saving tool. But more than one in three said they would use it to write assignments if there were no rules precluding it, with male and postgraduate students particularly willing to outsource their work to bots.
The survey also found that “becoming addicted” to AI, and “not learning anything” because of its overuse, were prominent student concerns. Almost half of respondents feared their use of AI for written assignments was reducing their critical thinking and communication skills. Less than half expressed confidence that they learned anything when they used AI for study, with pass-level students particularly dubious about the benefits.
However, students were relatively confident about their universities’ embrace of AI. Sixty per cent of respondents said their institutions were “fast enough” in adopting AI study support tools, up from 45 per cent two years earlier.
The survey found that students increasingly viewed AI as a “double-edged sword”, with 42 per cent of respondents concerned that it would reduce job opportunities in their fields, while 48 per cent saw AI skills as critical attributes for their careers.
Male students were particularly likely to consider AI both essential knowledge and an employability threat, the survey found.
john.ross@timeshighereducation.com
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber?
Increased use of new technologies accompanied by rising fear of being accused of cheating, with many universities’ policies on what is acceptable still unclear
Ombudsman tells universities to be mindful of ‘limitations’ of detection tools and to consider if they are biased against international students
Tools developed to stamp out misconduct have been shown to be biased and inaccurate. Will AI creators themselves be forced to do it better?
Tool developed by edtech giant used by customers 65 million times in three months since launch
Gaps in understanding between universities and their external partners leave students in a ‘vulnerable position’, report finds
Experts warn of increasing threat to systems used by universities at crunch points in the academic year after hundreds of thousands of student records compromised
StudySmarter warned over job listings set up to capture contact information
Amid concern over graduate outcomes and the declining value of a degree, one UK higher education provider that boasts a practically perfect employability record is setting its sights on official recognition – and disproving those who might question whether its students need to be at university at all
Subscribe to Times Higher Education
As the voice of global higher education, THE is an invaluable daily resource. Subscribe today to receive unlimited news and analyses, commentary from the sharpest minds in international academia, our influential university rankings analysis and the latest insights from our World Summit series.
Leave a Reply