You are logged in
Loading…
You don’t have any Active Subscription.
Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.
Your active subscription(s)
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
Products you’ve access to
Additional Subscription Benefits
Account Settings
Need help with your subscription?
July 3, 2026e-Paper
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary.
The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
July 3, 2026e-Paper
Updated – July 03, 2026 07:43 pm IST – NEW DELHI
YouTuber Dhruv Rathee. Photo Credit: X@dhruv_rathee
The Delhi High Court on Friday (July 3, 2026) directed the Centre’s Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC) to decide within 15 days an appeal seeking the removal of YouTuber Dhruv Rathee’s video titled “Can Hindus Eat BEEF? | Kerala Story 2 EXPOSED”.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma passed the direction while hearing a petition filed by advocate Amita Sachdeva, who has challenged the continued public availability of the video on YouTube. The court also cautioned that any disregard of its order would be viewed seriously.
Ms. Sachdeva, in her petition, contends that the video, uploaded on March 21, 2026, contains statements allegedly claiming that Hindu deities Lord Ram, Sita and Lord Krishna consumed meat and alcohol. She argued that the statements made in the video are “patently false, misleading and deliberately distorted” and capable of promoting communal disharmony.
“In this video, he deliberately makes highly offensive, false, and malicious statements insulting the divine character of Bhagwan Shri Ram, Seeta Mata, Bhagwan Shri Krishna and other revered Hindu icons by claiming that they consumed non-vegetarian food (including deer meat) and alcohol, while citing selective or distorted references from Hindu scriptures like Ramayana and Mahabharata,” her plea stated.
She sought either a direction to the GAC, which falls under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), to decide the pending appeal or, alternatively, an order directing the removal of the video from YouTube.
During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma argued that either YouTube should remove the video or the court should pass appropriate directions for its takedown, contending that the content disparages Hindu deities.
Google’s counsel stated that the company had already responded to Ms. Sachdeva’s grievance and that she had subsequently filed an appeal before the GAC, which remains pending.
Taking note of the submissions, the court directed the GAC to dispose of the appeal within 15 days.
According to the petition, Ms. Sachdeva initially lodged a complaint with the Cyber Crime Cell on March 22, 2026, followed by a grievance before YouTube’s Resident Grievance Officer on March 23.
Aggrieved by the non-action of YouTube, Ms. Sachdeva filed an appeal before the GAC.
After Youtube declined to remove the content, stating that they are unable to identify any violations of their community guidelines, Ms. Sachdeva approached the GAC on March 27. The petition alleges that despite the Information Technology rules requiring appeals to be resolved expeditiously, preferably within 30 days, the appeal remained undecided for more than two and a half months.
The petition further states that parallel criminal proceedings are also under way. It stated that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Courts, on June 9 called for an Action Taken Report from the Delhi Police on her application seeking registration of an FIR.
Published – July 03, 2026 07:14 pm IST
religion and belief / freedom of religion / court / judiciary (system of justice) / Delhi
Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
BACK TO TOP
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
Leave a Reply