This republished article first appeared in thatdougsmith.com
I’ve been a software developer for over 30 years. I love the craft of well-written software. A quest for high quality, clean architecture, and business value has defined my career. Employers have consistently promoted me to their highest senior developer level.
Given the trend of using generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude for software development, many companies have decided that developers must use GenAI to succeed. I strongly disagree. But my view is very unpopular.
So why would I hold a such a conviction? Even if it means I lose a job that I loved?
This post is to share my rationale. Mostly, I wrote this to bring clarity to myself in the face of a difficult employment decision. But it’s also for anyone curious to see why someone might reasonably not jump on this particular bandwagon.
Bottom line? It’s too risky. Today’s apparent short-term boost may lead to long-term regret.
To explain further, I’ve grouped twelve risks into five categories.
By the grace of God, I’m going all-in on our uniquely made-in-the-image-of-God human intelligence, creativity, innovation, wisdom, and discernment. And I’ll be encouraging all of us to do the same.
Nobody knows how GenAI will turn out. But it seems clear to me that Big AI companies don’t have our best interests in view as they overwhelm the world with their propaganda and power.
I have too much faith in the God who gave us our minds and hearts, and I believe that he will lead those of us who are betting on humanity along a better path than the one Big Tech has ordained.
Mind Matters features original news and analysis at the intersection of artificial and natural intelligence. Through articles and podcasts, it explores issues, challenges, and controversies relating to human and artificial intelligence from a perspective that values the unique capabilities of human beings. Mind Matters is published by the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence.
Leave a Reply