Will Congress demanding US military halt action in Iran end the war? – Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Home A Good Appetite Will Congress demanding US military halt action in Iran end the war? – Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Will Congress demanding US military halt action in Iran end the war? – Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Personalise the news and
stay in the know
Emergency
Backstory
Newsletters
中文新闻
BERITA BAHASA INDONESIA
TOK PISIN
Find any issues using dark mode? Please let us know
Topic:World Politics
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 4:28pm
Congress has passed a resolution that directs Donald Trump to halt military action against Iran. (Reuters: Elizabeth Frantz)
The US Senate approved a war powers resolution seeking to block military action against Iran on Tuesday, local time.
While the measure is considered largely symbolic, it reflects the growing concerns among Republican politicians over the war.
Here's what to know.
The Senate backed a resolution that directs US President Donald Trump to halt military action against Iran.
It was passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month.
The Senate voted 50 — 48, with four Republicans joining all but one Democrat in favour of the resolution.
Not exactly.
There's a big question mark over whether this measure is enforceable, according to legal experts.
It is the 10th time the Senate has tried to stop the war, and the outcome, on a vote of 50–48, is a stunning turnaround from past efforts.
While legislation usually needs a president's signature to be signed into law, the War Powers Act of 1973 states that war powers resolutions are exempt.
A Supreme Court ruling from 1983 complicates that, though, saying such a measure does need to be submitted for a president's signature or veto to have legal effect.
Meanwhile, the White House has insisted the War Powers Act is not constitutional and therefore, not binding.
On Tuesday, a White House official said the resolution had no force of law because it would not go before the president.
Experts say the disagreement would need to be settled in the courts.
"The executive branch will likely ignore it on constitutional grounds, and it's not clear who might have standing to sue to enforce it," said Scott Anderson, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and senior editor of the online legal publication Lawfare.
Democratic representative Gregory Meeks of New York, who sponsored the resolution in the House, said he viewed the resolution as binding and would pursue all legal avenues to ensure that the administration complies.
Gregory Meeks vowed to take the matter to court if the Trump administration does not comply. (Reuters: Kylie Cooper)
The Trump administration is also arguing about semantics: Congress has directed the government to stop the ongoing military action in Iran, but the White House says hostilities were terminated with a ceasefire on April 7.
It previously used this logic to get around a mandated 60-day deadline to end the war under the War Powers Act.
But John Hart, an American government specialist at the Australian National University, told the ABC in May the law referred to the commitment of troops, "and the troops are still there".
There are a few reasons.
Until recently, Mr Trump had enjoyed near-unanimous support from Republican members of Congress.
Republicans currently hold majorities in the House and the Senate, and they don't often break from the president on legislative issues.
Tuesday's result reflects growing concerns among Republican politicians over the war.
Tuesday's vote was a rare show of discord among Republicans. (Reuters: Evelyn Hockstein)
It also comes as the administration is expected to ask Congress to authorise tens of billions of dollars to pay for the war.
There's a historic aspect, too. This was the first time both chambers of Congress passed a resolution directing a president to remove US armed forces from hostilities since the War Powers Act was enacted in 1973.
In the end, eight Republicans were enough to deliver majorities in both the House and the Senate and rebuke Mr Trump:
Midterm elections, which will decide the new makeup of the House and the Senate, are just months away, and politicians are hesitant to support unpopular measures.
And the war in Iran is deeply unpopular.
Mr Trump campaigned for the White House on a promise to end US entanglements abroad, and to focus more on domestic issues.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Tuesday showed just one in four Americans believed the war was worth the costs.
The majority of respondents worried that a truce with Tehran was unlikely to last.
Mr Trump responded on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday night, calling the vote "poorly timed and meaningless", adding that it "provided aid and comfort" to Iran.
He said the vote "just made my job more difficult, but I will get it done, one way or the other, because I always get it done".
No.
The US claims "great progress" has been made with Iran during the first substantial talks to take place under the new deal to pause the war, but there are already conflicting messages from Iran. 
A ceasefire remains in place as peace talks continue between the US and Israel.
The terms of the deal are spelled out in a memorandum of understanding that Mr Trump signed last week.
That started a 60-day clock for both sides to reach a broader agreement over ending Iran's nuclear program.
The US has claimed "great progress" was made during high-level talks in Switzerland this week.
The technical talks are expected to continue through the rest of this week.
Mr Trump will head to the Capitol on Wednesday, local time, to meet with Republican senators over lunch.
The event was already slated to be tense before the vote.
He was invited to push for a separate bill, known as the SAVE America Act, which has caused clashes with several Republicans who say the president should focus on other measures.
"[The SAVE America Act] doesn't have the votes, and so it's time to talk about something else," said Senator Bill Cassidy, who recently lost his primary race to a Trump-backed opponent.
ABC/AP/Reuters
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 4:28pm
Topic:Avian Influenza
Topic:Crime
Topic:Police
Analysis by Gareth Hutchens
Topic:Social Media
Topic:Explainer
Topic:Explainer
Topic:Explainer
United States
Unrest, Conflict and War
World Politics
Topic:Avian Influenza
Topic:Crime
Topic:Police
Analysis by Gareth Hutchens
Topic:Social Media
Topic:Crime
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 5:14pm
Topic:Painting
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 5:13pm
Topic:Motor Neurone disease
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 5:03pm
Topic:Utilities
Wed 24 Jun 2026 at 5:01pm
Your home of Australian stories, conversations and events that shape our nation.
This service may include material from Agence France-Presse (AFP), APTN, Reuters, AAP, CNN and the BBC World Service which is copyright and cannot be reproduced.
Get the latest ABC News delivered to your email inbox
Stay informed and connected with the ABC. Covering a wide range of topics and brands including News, iview, listen, and more.

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.