0
By clicking the button, I accept the Terms of Use of the service and its Privacy Policy, as well as consent to the processing of personal data.
Don’t have an account? Signup
Powered by : 
Follow Us
As AI reshapes industries and boardrooms face new governance challenges, women leaders are arguing that inclusion must be measured as a business outcome, not a diversity initiative. For decades, the corporate conversation around women in leadership has largely revolved around representation.
How many women sit on boards? How many occupy leadership roles? How many make it to the C-suite?
But as artificial intelligence, digital transformation, and workforce shifts force enterprises to rethink leadership itself, a different conversation is emerging. Increasingly, women leaders are arguing that diversity is no longer an inclusion issue. It is becoming a business issue.
That shift was evident across discussions involving leaders from real estate, shipping, law, philanthropy, governance, and venture capital, where the focus moved well beyond representation and towards trust, decision-making, workforce resilience, AI readiness, and long-term business performance.
74% of security professionals reported gender-based discrimination, as suggested in the findings of the Women in Security Survey conducted by IIIRIS Consulting in collaboration with the CII Centre of Women Leadership. The survey report was launched during the India Women Leadership & Growth Summit 2026.
Key dignitaries including Anna Roy, Principal Economic Advisor, NITI Aayog and Mission Director, Women Entrepreneurship Platform; Amb. Gurjit Singh, Former Ambassador of India to ASEAN; and Dr Vikram Singh, Former DGP, Uttar Pradesh, along with senior leaders from industry, security, entrepreneurship and policy, addressed the summit.
The summit brought together policymakers, industry leaders, entrepreneurs, security professionals and women leaders to discuss leadership, security, risk, business resilience and growth. According to WISS 2026, 92.7% of organisations report having formal inclusion policies, flexible work arrangements or DEI frameworks in place. At the same time, 74% of security professionals said they have personally experienced or witnessed gender-based discrimination in a security workplace, while 84.5% of respondents continue to believe that women remain under-represented across security functions.
The report is based on responses from 730 security professionals and highlights the need to move from policy intent to consistent, measurable implementation. The report finds that the security sector has largely accepted the need for greater gender diversity. However, the findings point to a clear gap between policy adoption and lived workplace experience.
The message was clear that organisations that continue to treat gender diversity as an HR programme may be missing a larger strategic opportunity.
While much of the discussion focused on leadership gaps and structural barriers, the event also produced a concrete commitment aimed at changing the talent pipeline itself.
Acknowledging the under-representation of women in cybersecurity, digital forensics, and security-related professions, organisers announced a collaboration between NITI Aayog’s Women Entrepreneurship Platform (WEP) and IIIRIS to support women through education, entrepreneurship, mentorship, and leadership development.
The initiative goes beyond awareness campaigns. It seeks to create structured pathways into sectors that are expected to play a larger role in India’s digital economy over the next decade.
One of the first commitments came through the recently launched Marutra Centre for Security Studies. The centre will sponsor two PhD candidates, with organisers committing that at least one of those sponsored scholars will always be a woman.
The programme will also include a dedicated certified women’s leaders initiative for professionals already working in security and forensic sciences.
Speaking about the effort, organisers stressed that the objective is not merely to provide access but to improve outcomes.
“We are not going to be an incubator and accelerator where we only say that we have enabled. No, we are going to be more assurers that we are able to provide the right funding, the right kind of technology, mentorship.”
The announcement directly addresses one of the recurring themes that emerged throughout the day: women cannot be expected to catch up later in industries being built today around artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, digital trust, and emerging technologies.
Anna Roy, Principal Economic Advisor, NITI Aayog and Mission Director, Women Entrepreneurship Platform argued that successful inclusion requires more than training programmes. Entrepreneurs need access to markets, compliance support, mentorship, networking opportunities, and business development capabilities.
“Scaling is a very key part.”
Roy explained that the proposed framework would focus on identifying women already operating in security-related businesses, as well as aspiring entrepreneurs looking to enter the sector. Through WEP’s collaborative “award to reward” model, ecosystem partners will work together to provide not only financial support, but also practical business guidance and long-term handholding.
The significance of the announcement lies in its timing. Across industries, organisations are still trying to retrofit diversity into sectors that historically excluded women. Cybersecurity, digital forensics, AI, and emerging technology ecosystems offer an opportunity to build participation from the beginning rather than correcting imbalances years later.
That idea echoed another message repeatedly voiced during the event that future industries should not inherit the exclusion patterns of the past.
India’s gender paradox remains visible across sectors. Women account for nearly 43% of STEM graduates, yet only around 14% ultimately participate in the STEM workforce. Similar patterns appear across industries ranging from maritime operations and venture capital to infrastructure and technology.
The challenge is no longer attracting women into organisations. The challenge is retaining them, developing them, and ensuring they reach positions where strategic decisions are made.
As enterprises prepare for AI-driven transformation, this leadership gap becomes increasingly significant. Future growth will depend not only on technological adoption but also on the ability of organisations to manage multi-generational workforces, changing employee expectations, and new operating models.
Several leaders pointed out that the traditional leadership pipeline was designed around uninterrupted career progression and continuous workplace availability, assumptions that often fail to reflect the realities faced by many women professionals.
One of the most notable themes emerging from the discussions was the growing recognition that qualities traditionally labelled as “soft skills” now have direct business implications. Whether organisations are dealing with cybersecurity risks, employee retention, digital transformation, or operational resilience, trust increasingly influences outcomes.
As one industry leader observed: “Trust is not a soft skill. Trust is a competitive advantage.”
The statement highlights a broader shift occurring across enterprises. For years, leadership effectiveness was measured primarily through operational execution, financial performance, and growth metrics. Today, organisations are beginning to recognise that communication, stakeholder confidence, employee engagement, and organisational trust directly influence business performance.
The ability to build trust can determine whether transformation programmes succeed or fail. In that context, inclusion becomes less about representation and more about organisational effectiveness.
The discussion also challenged another long-standing assumption. Women leaders are often associated with people management, culture, diversity initiatives, employee well-being, and conflict resolution. While those capabilities remain important, many argued that such perceptions can unintentionally limit opportunities.
One participant framed it directly:
“We are made for P&L. We are made for operations. We are made for financials.”
The statement reflects growing frustration with the tendency to position women leaders primarily within support functions rather than core business functions.
Charu Thapar, Executive Vice President at Brookfield Properties, offered a perspective shaped by more than three decades in a sector traditionally dominated by men.
“I have never thought of myself as being unequal to anyone,” she said.
For Thapar, credibility was never built around identity.
“Knowledge has a lot of weight. If you’re able to convince people what you’re saying is of value, I don’t think you should undermine yourself.”
She pointed towards an increasingly important reality for organisations: expertise, execution, and business outcomes remain the strongest drivers of leadership credibility.
While policy discussions often focus on representation targets, another issue emerged repeatedly: access. Several leaders emphasised that career progression often depends on mentorship, sponsorship, and access to opportunities.
Sagarika Chakraborty, Chief Executive Officer, IIIRIS Consulting, highlighted the importance of senior leaders who actively create pathways for others.
“I have people in my life who not only guided me but also opened doors. They kept the door open for you to come and learn.”
The distinction matters. Mentorship helps individuals navigate organisations. Sponsorship creates opportunities inside them. As leadership pipelines become a critical business concern, organisations may need to invest as heavily in sponsorship ecosystems as they do in recruitment initiatives.
One of the strongest messages emerging from the discussion was directed at organisations themselves. Despite increasing awareness around diversity, many decisions continue to be made on behalf of women rather than with them. The examples ranged from operational assignments and leadership roles to location postings and field responsibilities.
The advice was straightforward:
“Please do not decide for the woman.”
The point reflects a subtle but persistent challenge in corporate environments. Many exclusionary decisions are not made with negative intent. They are often made under the assumption that certain opportunities may not suit women because of personal or family commitments.
However, such assumptions frequently remove opportunities before individuals have the chance to make decisions for themselves. As organisations pursue leadership diversity, eliminating these assumptions may prove as important as introducing new policies.
The emergence of AI may also present a unique opportunity. Historically, women have often entered industries after organisational structures and leadership hierarchies were already established.
AI presents a different scenario. The technology is still evolving, adoption models remain fluid, and workforce structures are still being defined.
Yet current workforce patterns suggest familiar imbalances are already emerging. According to data discussed during the session, roughly 71% of people employed in AI-related roles are men.
For many leaders, that represents both a warning and an opportunity.
“If AI is a new emerging area and your renewable energy is a new emerging area, all these new emerging areas – how do we equip the women’s workforce so that they automatically enter as opposed to us again retrofitting?”
Rather than correcting gender imbalances years later, organisations have an opportunity to build inclusion into emerging sectors from the outset. That requires targeted skilling programmes, intentional hiring practices, leadership development pathways, and greater participation of women in AI-related functions.
The discussion also highlighted a broader challenge facing boards. As AI adoption accelerates, governance can no longer remain isolated from technology. Boardrooms increasingly need to understand the implications of data, automation, cybersecurity, AI governance, and digital infrastructure.
Several speakers argued that technology awareness must become a core leadership capability rather than a specialist function delegated entirely to technology teams.
The future board member may not need to write code, but they will need to understand how technology influences risk, resilience, growth, and competitive positioning.
That transition places greater emphasis on diverse perspectives, particularly as organisations confront increasingly complex decisions involving technology and society.
One recurring theme connected every discussion: measurement. Many organisations now have inclusion policies. Many have diversity commitments. Many publicly acknowledge the problem.
The question increasingly being asked is whether organisations are measuring outcomes with the same rigour applied to financial performance.
“If you have an intent, then you act on the intent and measure the actions and feed in the measurement and redesign your actions again.”
The logic mirrors every other business investment. Intent without measurement rarely produces sustainable results. Retention rates, promotion pipelines, AI workforce participation, leadership representation, and business outcomes linked to diversity all require structured measurement. Without that, organisations risk confusing activity with progress.
The most significant shift emerging from the discussion may be conceptual rather than operational. For years, diversity was positioned as a social responsibility issue. Increasingly, leaders are framing it as a competitiveness issue.
When inclusion improves retention, strengthens trust, broadens leadership pipelines, improves decision-making, and helps organisations navigate technological change, it moves beyond compliance.
It becomes a business capability. As enterprises prepare for an AI-driven future, the organisations that succeed may not simply be those that adopt technology fastest. They may be those that build leadership structures capable of adapting alongside it. That requires more than bringing women into the room.
It requires recognising that trust, mentorship, resilience, communication, and diverse perspectives are not peripheral qualities in modern organisations. They are becoming central to how businesses compete.
Subscribe to our Newsletter!
Share this article
If you liked this article share it with your friends.
they will thank you later
Leave a Reply