Feel free to connect with him or check out his work. He’s everywhere — Upwork, YouTube, Spotify, SoundCloud, Collider, LinkedIn, Instagram.
Blockbuster anticipation is not just about size. Size is easy. A release date, a logo, a giant cast photo, a CinemaCon sizzle reel, none of that automatically means a movie has real heat in it. The blockbusters people go feral for usually promise something more specific. A return. A collision. A risk. A long-awaited payoff. A director getting too much money and enough trust to do something gloriously overcommitted. That is the difference between big movie and “I need opening night.”
And 2026 is packed with exactly that kind of argument. Legacy animation coming back for one more emotional swing, MCU stepping back in for a take over, Christopher Nolan probably at his post-production magic right now, there’s a lot at play. Here’s my take on these upcoming blockbuster movies by anticipation.
Supergirl is exciting, but it lands eighth for me because the anticipation is still a little more curious than feverish. Kara Zor-El (Milly Alcock) is strong casting, Craig Gillespie is a very smart pick if DC wants this thing to feel rougher and stranger than standard cosmic-hero polish, and the early footage sounded pleasingly dirty, less pristine cape iconography, more interplanetary bus grime, pirates, spider droids, and bruised momentum. That is a good sign. It means the film might actually understand that Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow should feel harsher and sadder than people casually expect from the character. Warner Bros. has it set for June 26, 2026.
What keeps it here is simple: I still need the emotional lock. The best superhero anticipation has one image or one dramatic line that suddenly makes the whole film feel inevitable. Supergirl sounds promising, and the rougher space-western texture is exactly the right instinct, but I am not yet in that irrational clear zone for it. I can see it becoming one of the year’s nicest surprises but there’s also a chance for it to swivel toward that Madame Web zone.
Moana sits here because the commercial confidence is obvious, though the emotional anticipation is a little more cautious. Moana (Catherine Laga’aia) plays the title role, and Maui (Dwayne Johnson) is back, which gives the project instant familiarity and star power. The trailer and CinemaCon material have leaned hard into the ocean, the songs, the broad family-adventure warmth, and the “we know this world already works” comfort play. From a pure blockbuster standpoint, that is smart. It is probably going to hit big.
But anticipation is not the same as confidence. With live-action Disney remakes, the question is always whether the film is uncovering something newly cinematic or just restaging inherited feeling at a larger budget level. Moana at least has a story strong enough to survive translation, identity, oceanic calling, cultural rootedness, self-doubt becoming purpose, but right now the pitch still feels more like a polished re-entry into familiar waters than a genuine leap. I am interested. I am not electrified.
Toy Story 5 is where anticipation starts becoming emotional risk. Pixar has the film dated for June 19, 2026, and the early material has already teased a “toys versus tech” angle, with Buzz Lightyear (Tim Allen), Woody (Tom Hanks), Jessie (Joan Cusack), and the gang confronting the fact that kids now have glowing screens competing with old imaginative play. That is a very smart hook, maybe almost too smart, since it gives the film an automatic generational ache before the plot has even properly started. Pixar has also previewed that Jessie will matter heavily, which is another reason fans are leaning in rather than just dutifully showing up.
Toy Story 3 already felt like the most emotionally complete ending imaginable, and even Toy Story 4 had to fight its way into legitimacy through pure execution. So every new installment carries suspicion alongside excitement. And that’s why I’m not too stoked for Toy Story 5. Still, the premise here has real juice. If the movie uses technology not as a boomer joke but as a way of asking what happens to old forms of companionship when attention itself has changed shape, this could really land.
Dune: Part Three is where anticipation starts feeling almost religious. Denis Villeneuve has the film set for December 18, 2026, and the reporting around it has made clear that the film is adapting Dune Messiah territory while bringing back Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet), Chani (Zendaya), Princess Irulan (Florence Pugh), Stilgar (Javier Bardem), Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson), and others, with Anya Taylor-Joy moving from tease to major presence and additional casting widening the next phase of the saga. Even before release, Warner Bros. was reporting major IMAX demand, which tells you how much faith audiences already have in Villeneuve’s control over this world.
And the reason the anticipation is so high is that Messiah material is where the triumph starts turning poisonous. The first two films built awe. The third one, if Villeneuve really goes for it, gets to build consequence. Paul as messiah-emperor is not simple blockbuster victory architecture. It is political dread, religious corrosion, intimacy damaged by destiny, charisma curdling into catastrophe. That makes this more exciting to me than a standard Part Three gets bigger situation. It has a chance to become the chapter where the franchise stops being merely majestic and becomes haunting.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day is one of the easiest top-three placements on the list since the emotional setup is so clean. No Way Home ended with Peter Parker (Tom Holland) stripped down to almost nothing, no public identity, no Avengers-status cushioning, no MJ (Zendaya), no Ned (Jacob Batalon), no social safety net, just the character in his loneliest and most stripped-back form in years. Sony announced the title Spider-Man: Brand New Day and has it set for July 31, 2026, and the early trade messaging has already leaned into the idea that this is a more grown-up Peter story. That is exactly the right pitch.
What makes me so excited is that Spider-Man is often best when his world gets smaller before it gets larger again. Not smaller in stakes, smaller in belonging. He is more vulnerable when he has something to lose and nobody to call. Holland coming back after that ending gives this movie immediate emotional leverage. You can feel the possibility of reset without erasure, of a bruised, more adult Peter trying to rebuild identity from scratch while the larger Marvel machine circles in the background. If they keep it street-level enough to hurt and expansive enough to feel cinematic, this could absolutely be one of the year’s most crowd-pleasing blockbusters.
Avengers: Doomsday is one of the year’s major pressure points. Marvel and Disney pushed the film to December 18, 2026, Joe Russo and Anthony Russo are back, and Doctor Doom (Robert Downey Jr.) gives the whole project an enormous amount of theatrical voltage even before you get into the sprawling cast configuration. The official cast rollout and the subsequent trade coverage made it crystal clear that Marvel is treating this as one of its major re-consolidation plays, not just another phase installment.
The pressure itself is exciting. Marvel is at its most interesting when the project feels slightly too big to control. That is when the anticipation turns nervous in the best way. Can they make the MCU feel like a true event machine again? Can they turn Doom into something more than stunt casting? Can the Russos recapture the disciplined escalation that made earlier Avengers finales feel like mass-viewing rituals rather than noisy obligations? I am not calm about this movie, and that is part of why it ranks so high.
The Odyssey had to be number one. Christopher Nolan adapting The Odyssey with Odysseus (Matt Damon) and one of the most intimidatingly stacked blockbuster casts in years, including Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Lupita Nyong’o, Charlize Theron, Jon Bernthal, Benny Safdie, and others, already sounds like a studio flex from a healthier era. Universal has it opening July 17, 2026, and the trade coverage plus trailer rollout have only reinforced the scale of the thing. This is not being sold as a modest literary prestige adaptation. It is being sold as an event epic, a giant myth-machine in the hands of a director who already treats time, ordeal, and masculine obsession like sacred cinematic fuel.
And emotionally, this is the easiest number one on the page. The Odyssey is one of the foundational adventure stories for a reason: monsters, gods, shipwrecks, seductions, war aftershock, homecoming as trauma, identity proved through endurance. In Nolan’s hands, that material could become overwhelming in the best possible way, stern, huge, mournful, ecstatic, physically punishing. More than any other title here, this is the one that feels like it could give blockbuster cinema something it has been missing: grandeur without plasticity. Not just scale, but scale with blood in it. That is the dream. That is why it sits at the top.
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
We want to hear from you. Share your perspective in the comments below, and please keep the conversation respectful.
Your comment has not been saved
This space is open for discussion.
Be the first to share your thoughts.
Leave a Reply